Groupon files for hotly anticipated IPO
NEW YORK
The prospect is likely to intensify a debate about whether an
investment bubble is forming around promising but still unproven
Internet companies.
Groupon took the first step toward selling its stock on Wall
Street by filing its IPO papers Wednesday with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The much-anticipated filing comes just two
weeks after LinkedIn Corp., a popular Internet service for
professional networking, saw its shares double in their first day
of trading. That surge evoked memories of the early stages of the
dot-com boom in the 1990s.
Groupon, based in Chicago, offers its subscribers the chance to
purchase daily discounts targeted to their city and preferences.
For example, a subscriber might pay $20 for a $40 gift certificate
to a spa, restaurant, car wash or yoga studio.
The initial price of Groupon's shares and the number of shares
won't be set until the company gets closer to going public. That
process typically takes three to four months.
The shares probably won't be cheap, based on the confidence that
Groupon showed last year when it rejected a $6 billion takeover
offer from Internet search leader Google Inc. Groupon said in its
filing it hopes to raise up to $750 million in the IPO, but that
figure often changes as investment bankers get a better idea of the
demand for the stock. The banks handling Groupon's IPO are Morgan
Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse.
A wide variety of Internet companies are getting ready to offer
their stocks to investors hoping to get rich off the next big
thing. Zynga, the maker of popular Web games such as FarmVille,
could be next in the IPO line, with plenty of others, such as
online message service Twitter, waiting in the wings.
"The party has started," said John Fitzgibbon, founder of
IPOscoop.com.
Facebook, perhaps the most anticipated Internet IPO-in-waiting,
has indicated it probably won't file its IPO papers until next
April, at the earliest.
Groupon's filing indicated some of the company's early investors
intend to sell some of their holdings in the IPO but didn't provide
further details.
Venture capitalists and other investors already have poured $1.1
billion into Groupon, a huge amount for a service founded just 2 1/2
years ago by Andrew Mason and Eric Lefkofsky. Groupon started as a
side project to another website called The Point that helped raise
funds for various causes.
Mason, 30, remains Groupon's CEO and one its largest
stockholders with more than 23 million shares. That puts him in
line to be a billionaire, if investors like Groupon's stock as much
as consumers seem to like its daily deals.
Groupon has created a new marketing phenomenon catering to
people's hunger for bargains. The service has become so popular
that it now offers more than 1,000 daily deals to 83 million
subscribers in 43 countries, a work load handled by 7,100
employees. It's bringing in lots of money, but not enough so far to
defray the costs of its rapid expansion.
Last year, Groupon lost $413 million on revenue of $713 million.
By comparison, Google earned $106 million on revenue of $1.5
billion in the last full year before it went public in 2004.
Groupon, though, is growing at a much faster pace than Google
was when it went public. In the first quarter of this year,
Groupon's revenue rose more than 14-fold from the same time last
year to $644 million. Google's revenue had tripled to $652 million
in the first quarter of the year in which it went public.
Groupon's growth is "nothing short of staggering," said David
Menlow, president of research company IPOfinancial.com. "Is this a
pattern that has a short shelf-life?"
Both Google and Facebook are among the dozens of other companies
angling to siphon revenue away from Groupon with copycat coupon
services. "It's not hard to do what Groupon does," said Scott
Sweet, managing partner of IPOboutique.com. He expects Groupon's
brand recognition to help it stand out.
Mason signaled he intends to run Groupon as an unorthodox,
fun-loving company, much like Google co-founders Larry Page and
Sergey Brin did when they included a letter outlining their
philosophy with that company's IPO papers.
"We want the time people spend with Groupon to be memorable,"
Mason wrote in his own letter. "Life is too short to be a boring
company. Whether it's with a deal for something unusual, such as
fire dancing classes, or a marketing campaign ... we seek to create
experiences for our customers that make today different enough from
yesterday to justify getting out of bed."
In another echo of Google's experimental philosophy, Mason
advised prospective investors to "expect us to make ambitious bets
on our future that distract us from our current business."
Groupon's IPO filing had people buzzing at the D: All Things
Digital conference at the Rancho Palos Verdes resort where Mason
appeared on stage Wednesday.
Although he deflected a question about when Groupon would go
public, Mason said he didn't see any downside to an IPO.
"The good thing, I think, is that in this day and age, you can
go public and ... people have tolerance for companies running for
the long term," Mason said.
There's a good chance, though, that many investors will be
looking to profit quickly from Groupon's IPO. That appears to have
already happened with LinkedIn.
The shares were initially sold at $45 apiece, mostly to money
managers and institutional investors, and then shot up as high as
$122.70 before falling back to close at $94.25 on the first day of
trading. That left LinkedIn with a market value of $9 billion,
about 18 times its projected revenue this year.
That lofty appraisal and general enthusiasm for Internet IPOs
has drawn comparisons to the August 1995 IPO of Web browser pioneer
Netscape Communications. Its stock also doubled on the first day of
trading and paved the way for hundreds of other Internet companies
to go public.
"I think it's going to be rolling thunder," Chris Fralic,
managing partner of venture capital fund First Round Capital, said
of the current climate for Internet IPOs.
LinkedIn's performance shows the investments aren't for the
faint-hearted. Although still well above the IPO price, LinkedIn
shares closed Thursday at $78.63 -- a two-week decline in market
value of 17 percent, or about $1.5 billion.
"Obviously people who bought at the top are losing a fortune,"
IPOboutique.com's Sweet said. "They probably should have known
better and let it settle back."