Texas Supreme Court allows child abuse investigations into families of transgender teens to continue
For LGBTQ mental health support, call the Trevor Project's 24/7 toll-free support line at 866-488-7386. You can also reach a trained crisis counselor through the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline by calling 800-273-8255 or texting 741741.
Texas' child welfare agency remains blocked from investigating the family of a transgender teen that sued the state in March, but can once again investigate other families that provide gender-affirming care after the Supreme Court of Texas struck down a statewide injunction Friday.
The video above is from a previous report when Texas Children's Hospital halted hormone-related therapies for transgender children.
Though it overturned the injunction on procedural grounds, the high court raised questions about why the Department of Family and Protective Services opened these investigations in the first place. The court affirmed in Friday's ruling that neither Attorney General Ken Paxton nor Gov. Greg Abbott had any grounds to direct the agency's actions.
In February, Paxton issued a nonbinding legal opinion that equated certain medical treatments and procedures for transgender teens with child abuse. Abbott, citing that opinion, then sent a letter to DFPS directing the agency to investigate parents who provided gender-affirming care to their transgender children.
In a statement responding to the order, DFPS said it would "follow Texas law" as laid out in Paxton's opinion, "[i]n accordance with Governor Abbott's directive." The agency proceeded to open at least nine investigations into parents of transgender children.
"The Governor and the Attorney General were certainly well within their rights to state their legal and policy views on this topic, but DFPS was not compelled by law to follow them," Friday's ruling reads. "DFPS's press statement, however, suggests that DFPS may have considered itself bound by either the Governor's letter, the Attorney General's Opinion, or both. Again, nothing before this Court supports the notion that DFPS is so bound."
The ruling does note the myriad "informal mechanisms" through which elected officials can influence a state agency, but "ultimately, however, one department or another has the final say."
In this case, the ruling said, DFPS was responsible for deciding whether these investigations aligned with current state regulations - and will now have to decide whether to continue these investigations and allow new ones to be opened.
DFPS employees have told The Texas Tribune that agency leadership has acknowledged that these investigations do not meet the current requirements for child abuse and have said policy would need to be generated to match the governor's directives.
In March, a district judge granted an injunction blocking the state from continuing these investigations or opening new ones. Paxton appealed that decision to the Third Court of Appeals, which reinstated the statewide temporary injunction.
He then petitioned the Supreme Court of Texas to review that appeal. In Friday's ruling, the high court agreed with Paxton that the appeals court overstepped - while the appeals court can reinstate an injunction if it "preserves the parties' rights," they cannot reinstate a temporary injunction of any nature.
In this case, the justices ruled, the "parties" are the family that sued the state initially - not all parents of all transgender children.
The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans - and engages with them - about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
