Justice Department asks judge to block Texas from enforcing abortion law

The DOJ and the state of Texas are set to face off over the emergency injunction on Friday, Oct. 1
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department has asked a federal court in Texas to stop the enforcement of a new state law that bans most abortions in the state while it decides the case.

On Wednesday afternoon, a federal judge set a court date for the Justice Department and the state to face off over Pres. Joe Biden's effort to get the emergency injunction.

It's set for Friday, Oct. 1.

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman, who was assigned the case, said in an order that Texas must respond to the government's motion filed Tuesday night no later than Wednesday, Sep. 29.

The U.S. must file its reply to Texas no later than 9 a.m. on the date of the hearing.

The Texas law, known as SB8, prohibits abortions once medical professionals can detect cardiac activity - usually around six weeks, before some women know they're pregnant. Courts have blocked other states from imposing similar restrictions, but Texas' law differs significantly because it leaves enforcement to private citizens through civil lawsuits instead of criminal prosecutors.

ORIGINAL STORY: Texas' ban of abortions as early as 6 weeks takes effect, prompting White House condemnation

The law went into effect earlier this month after the Supreme Court declined an emergency appeal from abortion providers asking that the law be stayed.

In Tuesday night's emergency motion in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, the Justice Department said "a court may enter a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction as a means of preventing harm to the movant before the court can fully adjudicate the claims in dispute."

Last week, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit in Texas asking a federal judge to declare that the law is invalid because it unlawfully infringes on the constitutional rights of women and violates the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which says federal law supersedes state law.

The department made a similar argument in seeking the restraining order or temporary injunction and said that it's challenge would likely be successful.
"When other States have enacted laws abridging reproductive rights to the extent that S.B. 8 does, courts have enjoined enforcement of the laws before they could take effect. In an effort to avoid that result, Texas devised an unprecedented scheme that seeks to deny women and providers the ability to challenge S.B. 8 in federal court. This attempt to shield a plainly unconstitutional law from review cannot stand."

Under the Texas law, someone could bring a lawsuit - even if they have no connection to the woman getting an abortion - and could be entitled to at least $10,000 in damages if they prevail in court.

MORE: Abortion law doesn't need to cover rapes because Texas' goal is to eliminate them, Texas governor says

The Texas law is the nation's biggest curb to abortion since the Supreme Court affirmed in the landmark 1973 decision Roe v. Wade that women have a constitutional right to an abortion.

Abortion providers have said they will comply, but already some of Texas' roughly two dozen abortion clinics have temporarily stopped offering abortion services altogether. Clinics in neighboring states, meanwhile, have seen a surge in patients from Texas.

RELATED: Rape survivor and women's health advocates say Abbott's goals on eliminating rape are unrealistic
Copyright © 2021 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.